<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I-CAFÉ PILIPINAS &#187; White Papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/category/position-papers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.icafepilipinas.org</link>
	<description>Working For A Better Internet Café Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:30:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Towards Having An IP-Compliant Society</title>
		<link>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/06/14/towards-havingan-intellectual-property-compliant-society-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/06/14/towards-havingan-intellectual-property-compliant-society-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 06:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP Seal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icafepilipinas.org/?p=1654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/06/14/towards-havingan-intellectual-property-compliant-society-part-i/' addthis:title='Towards Having An IP-Compliant Society '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Part of the job of I-Cafe Pilipinas as the national advocacy organization representing the internet cafe owners and operators in the country is to bring to the attention of our stakeholders the issues and programs that would greatly affect the manner in which they conduct the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/06/14/towards-havingan-intellectual-property-compliant-society-part-i/' addthis:title='Towards Having An IP-Compliant Society '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p style="text-align: justify">One of the functions of I-Cafe Pilipinas as the national advocacy organization representing the internet cafe owners and operators in the country is to bring to the attention of our stakeholders issues and programs that would greatly affect the manner in which they conduct their businesses.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">In this regard, we say that we are quite alarmed with the latest development that is taking place in which certain sectors in the ICT industry (private organizations and government agencies) are conceptualizing and promoting programs with the aim of creating an Intellectual Property  (IP) Compliant Society in the Philippines.  We believe that the conceptualization and promotions of these programs would not only have an effect on the internet cafe industry but also in the manner in which the whole ICT industry in the Philippines conduct their businesses.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">First of all, we want to  make it clear that I-Cafe Pilipinas supports all actions of both private organizations and government agencies that would promote the protection of intellectual properties in the Philippines.  From the very beginning we have been<span id="more-1654"></span> very active in promoting to our stakeholders to use only licensed software in their operation and have cooperated fully with Microsoft Philippines in the promotion of their I-Cafe Program that provided opportunities to the internet cafe operators to be able to purchase affordable software licenses for their operations.  Our stand is unwavering that it is to the best interest of our stakeholders to use only Intellectual Property Compliant Software in their operations.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">What we do not support are programs and activities that would:</p>
<ol style="text-align: justify">
<li>Curtail the Human Rights of the stakeholders in the IT industry in the guise of Intellectual Property Rights Protection;</li>
<li>Put an additional layer of Red Tape to an already over regulated industry that would provide hindrance to its development and growth; and</li>
<li>Use these programs to collect fees that could reach to a large amount of financial resources that is not directly accountable for use in the development and growth of the ICT industry in the Philippines.</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: justify">Specifically, I-Cafe Pilipinas does not oppose the issuance of the IP Seal by the <a href="http://ipcoalition.ph/" target="_blank">IP Coalition</a> if it is done under the following context and practices:</p>
<ul>
<li>Create public awareness of IPR at all levels of the community;</li>
<li>Give due recognition to ICT firms that complies with the IPR law by providing an IP Seal of Excellence;</li>
<li>It is common industry practice to provide accreditation and the awarding of Seals of Excellence to firms who are able to comply with the set of standards set by the accrediting organization like the ISO Certification for industries and the PAASCU accreditation for schools, colleges and universities;</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify">And lastly, we do believe that it is the right of the IP coalition to impose fees that are necessary for the accreditation of those ICT firms that would <strong>voluntarily</strong> avail themselves of the IP Seal of Recognition.</p>
<p><strong>What I-Cafe Pilipinas opposes is the use of the IP Seal of Recognition in the following instances:</strong><em></em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;padding-left: 30px"><strong>a)</strong><em> <strong>For IPR enforcement</strong></em> – in order to motivate ICT-based businesses in the country to avail themselves of the IP Seal of Excellence, the IP Coalition promised the recipient a one-year immunity from software piracy enforcement initiated by  the Business Software Alliance (BSA). This we truly believe curtails the Constitutional Right Against Self Incrimination. ICT companies who would not voluntarily avail themselves of the IP Seal of Recognition are branded as IP non-compliant and therefore gives the right for the BSA to initiate software piracy enforcement against them.  It undermines the basic constitutional process that provides individuals and businesses protection against illegal searches and the disruption of their businesses.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;padding-left: 30px">The use of the IP Seal of Excellence for IPR enforcement also undermines the basic right of the individual or of businesses to choose which systems that they believe would provide productivity in their organizations. The IP Seal of Excellence would be given only to those businesses that uses the products who are members of the IP Coalition and it would not provide recognition to those business organizations that uses Alternative Systems in their operations which are also IPR compliant.  Thus raising the possibility of business organizations being continually harassed by software piracy enforcement initiated by BSA.<strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;padding-left: 30px"><strong>b) <em>Possibility of Making the IP Seal of Excellence Mandatory in Business Registration Purposes</em></strong> – the IP Coalition is known for its strong legislative advocacy to strengthen the Regulatory Framework of the IP laws in the country. The Coalition was at the forefront of the advocacy for the passage of the Optical media Law (Rep. Act 9239), a law that regulates the manufacture, mastering, reproduction, sale, importation, and exportation of optical discs and is very much active promoting IPR ordinances in the different municipalities and cities around the country through their LGU Template.  There is a high probability that through the legal process the IP Coalition would be able to make the IP Seal of Excellence mandatory before any ICT company would be able to register their business in the country.  It would provide another layer of red tape that would greatly affect the ability of our ICT firms to compete in the open market in terms of cost of doing business.</p>
<p style="text-align: right"><em>To be continued . . .</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/06/14/towards-havingan-intellectual-property-compliant-society-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I-Café Pilipinas Submits Position Paper On Drafting Of IRR For RA 9775</title>
		<link>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/03/25/i-cafe-pilipinas-submits-position-paper-on-drafting-of-irr-for-ra-9775/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/03/25/i-cafe-pilipinas-submits-position-paper-on-drafting-of-irr-for-ra-9775/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-child pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[position paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icafepilipinas.org/?p=1254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/03/25/i-cafe-pilipinas-submits-position-paper-on-drafting-of-irr-for-ra-9775/' addthis:title='I-Café Pilipinas Submits Position Paper On Drafting Of IRR For RA 9775 '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>I-Café Pilipinas, being the national advocacy body of the Internet café industry in the country, got invited to participate in the Regional Consultation on the Drafting of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act 9775 (Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009) held last March 9, 2010 at College of Saint Benilde Hotel in Malate, Manila. The consultation meeting was attended by various government agencies and private sector representatives concerned with the implementation of the newly enacted law. The discussions lasted a whole day with proposals and suggestions on how to implement the various provisions of the Act freely exchanged by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/03/25/i-cafe-pilipinas-submits-position-paper-on-drafting-of-irr-for-ra-9775/' addthis:title='I-Café Pilipinas Submits Position Paper On Drafting Of IRR For RA 9775 '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p style="text-align: right"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/xicowner/position-paper-on-drafting-of-irr-for-ra-9775"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1255" title="Position_Paper" src="http://www.icafepilipinas.org/files/2010/03/Position_Paper.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="315" /></a>By: <strong>Ed Zafra</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">I-Café Pilipinas, for being the national advocacy body of the Internet café industry in the country, got invited to participate in the <strong>Regional Consultation on the Drafting of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act 9775 (Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009)</strong> held last March 9, 2010 at College of Saint Benilde Hotel in Malate, Manila. The consultation meeting was attended by various government agencies and private sector representatives concerned with the implementation of the newly enacted law. The discussions lasted a whole day with proposals and suggestions on how to implement the various provisions of the Act freely exchanged by the participants.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The position paper submitted by I-Café Pilipinas to the technical working group which will finalize the IRR of the new law is a reiteration of the organization&#8217;s position as contained in our white paper<span id="more-1254"></span> on the then Anti-Child Pornography Bill. Now that the bill is already a law, I-Café is aiming for a role in the implementation of the provisions of the law. The organization seeks for the consideration of the nominating agency for its inclusion in the Inter-Agency Council Against Child Pornography (IACACP) as one of the three (3) non-governmental organizations who will be in the Council that will coordinate, monitor and oversee the implementation of the Act.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">On Internet filtering at ISP level, I-Café Pilipinas expressed its objection on the blanket filtering of  web contents with the purpose of blocking only the child pornographic materials taht may go through it. Instead of doing blanket filtering, we suggest the banning of IP addresses of sites to be submitted by IACACP to the Internet Service Providers which incidentally has a confusing definition in the Act such that many participants in the consultation meeting thought that i-cafés are covered by the law as ISPs. We likewise seek clarification in the definition of &#8220;internet service providers&#8221; to specifically exclude i-cafés in the term as used in the Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">You can see related information about this subject at <a href="http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/03/11/consultations-on-the-draft-irr-of-republic-act-no-9775/" target="_blank">Consultations On The Draft IRR Of Republic Act No. 9775.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2010/03/25/i-cafe-pilipinas-submits-position-paper-on-drafting-of-irr-for-ra-9775/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Anti Child Pornography Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2009/07/17/on-anti-child-pornography-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2009/07/17/on-anti-child-pornography-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-child pronography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web filtering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icafepilipinas.org/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I-Café Pilipinas is a national network that is primarily composed of the different internet café owners, operators and internet café associations around the country. Its primary purpose is to represent their interest on issues on a national level that would gravely affect the effective operations of the different internet cafes in the country.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Let it not be construed that I-Café Pilipinas does not support the passage of the “Anti-Child Pornography Bill” that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2009/07/17/on-anti-child-pornography-bill/' addthis:title='On Anti Child Pornography Bill '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>I</strong>-Café Pilipinas is a national network that is primarily composed of the different internet café owners, operators and internet café associations around the country. Its primary purpose is to represent their interest on issues on a national level that would gravely affect the effective operations of the different internet cafes in the country.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>L</strong>et it not be construed that I-Café Pilipinas does not support the passage of the “Anti-Child Pornography Bill” that is presently heard in the House of Representatives. From the first time that we have heard of such an initiative we have fully supported it and would like to see its passage as a national law in order to provide added protection for our children.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>A</strong>fter a thorough reading of both the Senate and House version of the bill, it seems to us that this proposed national law is centered upon the program of MANDATORY INSTALLATION OF BLOCKING SOFTWARE. In the Senate version centered upon the mandatory installation of blocking software by the internet services providers but the one in the House of Representatives went on further. Not only will the internet service providers be have to install these blocking software but also internet cafes, schools and private business establishments ( I am now wondering why is it that government agencies are not included in the list? ). There are no other provisions for support programs that should be in place in order to fight child pornography in the Philippines. Both of these bills have centered upon the use of blocking software to fight child pornography in the country.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>T</strong>his MANDATORY INSTALLATION OF BLOCKING SOFTWARE provision raises some concern primarily due to the following issues:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>1</strong>. It would just provide an atmosphere of compliancy on the part of those in government by relying so much on the performance of this blocking software to get rid of child pornography or access to pornography by children. Studies done and actual experiences of people who have used this software would contend their effectiveness in blocking pornographic content. There were times in which legitimate queries were blocked due to its proximity with pornographic terms.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>2</strong>. Mandatory installation of blocking software taunt amounts to Censorship for it would not only block pornographic materials but could be used as a tool by people in government to block other content in the internet that they deemed as offensive.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>3</strong>. Enabling such provision would be subject to abuse by government regulators. Time and time again it has been proven that some government officials use the law for their personal gains. What would prevent them from imposing expensive blocking software to be used by internet cafes, schools and business establishments?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>4</strong>. There is also a question of cost and maintenance of software. What would prevent the internet service providers and other parties to distribute the cost of this blocking software to their customers?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>R</strong>ecommendations:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>a</strong>. Our law makers should consider this provision of Mandatory Installation of Blocking software since its effectiveness in combating child pornography and access to pornography is highly questionable and it is open to abuses.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>b</strong>. Using technology as a way to solve the problems that it has created is just an easy way out but it does not necessarily solve the problem. The problem with child pornography and pornography itself involves a human solution. One must not only take into consideration the <strong>medium or technical aspects of the problem but the human aspects as well.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>T</strong>he truth is that even with the presence of blocking software it would not fully deter the problem that pornography brings. Our children would still be very vulnerable to online threats that technology brings since they lack the necessary information in letting them decide for themselves what is good or bad for them. The blocking software would only shield them from the problem but would not solve the problem itself. We are comparing our children to a horse that needs fly masks to cover their eyes so that they could just have a limited field of vision.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>W</strong>e truly believe that the children of today are different for they have in their hands the power of technology to access vast amounts of information that is incomparable to any point of history. It is the responsibility of parents, teachers, government officials and IT practitioners to empower them so that they could make the right choices on to how access the information that they need properly and how to process them. Instead of finding ways in which we would censure information to them let us find ways in which they would be able to understand the information that they have access to.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>T</strong>he center piece of this legislation should be more on the empowerment of the child and the other stakeholders like their parents through education. They must be made to realize the importance and the responsibility that they have in using technology. Since we in today’s world could not live without technology then it would only be proper for government to take the initiative to empower its people by including Netiquette as part of the regular school curriculum in the elementary and secondary education. If sex education has been a part of the school curriculum for years, I really don’t see any reason why a national standard for computer related education could be put in place by our government officials.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>c</strong>. Given the importance and the problems brought about by the advances in internet technology, a national agency must be created that would handle the creation of policies and standards with regards to information communication technologically related matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icafepilipinas.org/index.php/2009/07/17/on-anti-child-pornography-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

